How could student evaluations of university professors and faculty be used most effectively? In my opinion, student evaluations should be used for adjusting course materials and improvements in the delivery of lectures. Those are the most important areas because students mostly interact with professors and read textbooks. Therefore, student feedback on them is very valuable. How these evaluations could be used specifically? First of all, in my country, course material is usually defined by the requirements of government institutions. As a result, the material could become outdated since those agencies rarely review the requirements. Here the evaluations become handy. Some of students are very motivated and have a much better understanding of their area of study than employees of the government institutions. Professors and faculties could use them to include additional topics in a curriculum. Likewise, they can plan less academic hours on topics which are not actual. I believe that evaluations of students who graduated from university are helpful as well. The main reason is that graduate students can estimate the value of a study program from the market's point of view. In other words, they see which of courses are useful because they apply their knowledge and skills at work. Second, the feedback of students regarding professors must be used for improvements in lecture delivery. Lectors have a chance to understand what students like and dislike. It could be a quality of a presentation, a volume of speech or communication with auditory. Professors can spend some time working on these issues. When I was a student, I often wanted to tell my professors what I think about the content of a lecture. But I didn't because I was afraid that my critics can offend them and affect my scores. Finally, I believe that student evaluations are very useful. They give opportunities to make changes in courses and lecture delivery. I hope that someday they will be required in all universities.