Corrections · 6
First, it is threatening our knowledge and understanding progress. Knowledge has been evolving in parallel with our science tools. As The better tools the science community has, the better the understanding of the reality. Every time a new technique is discovered, the review of our museums and universities' (apostrophe shows possession, the assets belong to the universities) assets can result in revealing knowledge.
Second,
the risk of loses is certainly high. Those are heavy bones,
treacherously similar to rocks, but extremely fragile in fact. And
worse, this specimen is worth more sold by as parts than in a as a whole, especially in on the black market, that where people will pay a lot only for a teeth tooth.
Finally, this could engage the black market. Some places in the world have large assets of fossils being in poor locations. It seems clear that the risk of spoliation (you just taught me a new word in English, hahahaha) in poor countries could rise with these transactions, except unless we legislate.
Topics like this one, that which seem to have less of an impact on our lives and the planet compared to others, are also asking for our reasoning and action.
Wow, you are at a really high level of English. I felt like my college professor here. Great job! My corrections should make things sound more natural. Keep it up :)
A Dinosaur Saw Paris
A dinosaur was seen in Paris on in June.It was not a typical youtuber's joke, neither nor the commercial campaign of Jurassic World, it was not an nor an illusion neither.
The skeleton of a very special dinosaur was exposed in the first stage (do you mean first floor or the early days?) of the Eiffel Tower. It was an auction, an extremely expensive one in fact. The bid started from at 1 million euros and rose until to 1.58 m € paid by a private buyer, the identity of whom has been kept in a secret.
It is common that unaffordable objects are sold to private wealthy hands (makes sense but sounds better as "are sold to wealthy private entities" or "fall into the hands of the wealthy"). It has been happening with paintings, celebrity's belongings, books, and like in this case, with pieces of natural history.
It seems they are legal. The skeleton was found in a U.S. excavation with all the clearances fulfilled. it went out USA fulfilling The U.S. followed all of the applicable exportations export procedures.
But, can we can afford it? What is the impact of hiding treasures.
Universities and museums cannot spend this incredible sum of money, typically only private handlers entities can do it. But this is not new. Historically we have had "mecenas" (???) and philanthropists have been involved acting in arts, science, etc. Think about it, could arts have evolved without those figures in the past? It seems clear that the private money is needed.
But this is a special case, a skeleton of what it could be have been a new species, with an unprecedented 75% conservation degree rate, now kidnapped into private hands.
What are the impacts of allowing this skeleton to only be enjoyed by private hands?
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
