Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled.
Topic: Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
My answer:
It is true that our waste from home we do not recycle enough in our society. Some agree the increasing legal policy would force us to change the situation of recycling. However, I do not agree with this point of views that government should take the full responsibilities of recycling by following reasons.
In my opinion, the legal law is only useful for short term of changes to recycle properly for our communities. Although people would be afraid of punishment to change the way of fully recycling their daily wastes. Therefore, there are many hidden tricks behind the law. For instance, people would do the good job on recycling in the situation that government would notice, but completely change the way outside the requirement.
Another reason is that I believe the government should do more than just implement the law, and able to educate the idea of protecting our environment. In addition, human behavior can be changed when they agree with the ideas, especially while they received the benefits which would inspire them to change the behavior. For example, the government might run reward campaigns to encourage resident to take the action of recycling. Or even plan ahead in recycling concept into the early education.
In conclusion, the legal policy is not only the method to make our earth an environment-friendly place to live, but also there are a variety of strategies that would change our behavior of recycling. I totally agree with the ideas of education to drive the recycling concept from the bottom which would remind deeply for the long term.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 3
1
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled.
Topic: Some people claim that not enough of the waste from our homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.My answer:
It is true that we do not recycle enough of our waste from our homes in our society. Some agree the increasing legal policy would force us to change the situation of recycling (optional = ....change the way we recycle). However, I do not agree with this point of view that government should take the full responsibilities of recycling by due to the following reasons.
In my opinion, the legal law (optional = legal system) is only useful for short term of changes to recycle properly for our communities. Although people would be afraid of punishment to if they did not change the way of fully they recycle their daily wastes. Therefore, there are many hidden tricks *behind the law. For instance, people would do the a good job of recycling in the situation so that the government would notice, but completely change their ways *outside the requirement.
Another reason is that I believe the government should do more than just implement the law, is that the government should be able to educate the idea of protecting our environment. In addition, human behavior can be changed when *they agree with the ideas, especially while *they received the benefits which would inspire them to change their behavior. For example, the government might run reward campaigns to encourage residents to take the action of recycling. Or even teach people in early education how to recycle.
In conclusion, the legal policy is not only the method to make our earth an environment-friendly place to live, but also there are a variety of strategies that would change our behavior of recycling. I totally agree with the ideas of education to drive the recycling concept from the bottom up, *which would remind deeply for the long term.
COMMENTS:
(1) "*behind the law" and "*outside the requirement" have ambiguous meaning, i'm not sure what you mean by these phrases. Can you tell me? 如果你用中文写,我可以为你翻译 (hopefully hahaha)
(2) "*they" who is 'they' pointing to (referring to)? The government or the people or the residents?
(3) "*which would remind deeply for the long term." Do you mean = which would be beneficial in the long term?
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me :) You did a really good job. Writing an essay and argument is not an easy task, you did great!
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
