The best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. So what extend do you agree? Some would argue that bigger fuel prices could be an easy solution for problems with the environment. I disagree with this statement because it can have a negative impact on lives of average people and does not encourage them to spot using cars. I believe that the best measure of diminishing air pollution should not touch raising fuel cost because this decision would be implemented by ordinary citizen's cost. It is not a secret that fuel spendings are included in product's price and if the fuel price would start growing the goods prices would show the same growth. The similar picture will be with prices for personal and public transport that people use for their daily commute. For instance, the Russian government decided to enlarge price to petrol by 15% in the 2015 year, it immediately leads to increasing cost of living by 16%. I convinced that expensive petrol would not force people to withdraw the cars because it is the most convenient way for movement by now. If there was a better alternative to a car than people could exchange their transport to something that doesn't spoil the environment. But if the price for fuel was hier than millions of people whose daily routine depends on the driving car would be forced to spend more money. For example, 67% of Russian population lives in regions with poorly developed transport infrastructure and the social subway showed that 85% of respondents would have to buy petrol to get their work. In conclusion, increasing price to fuel is not the best way to save the planet from air pollution because it penalizes average citizens and they will go on using cars for everyday needs.