Search from various English teachers...
Spain flagMendi
Year million (2) Three days later rings the doorbell at home. You can imagine the surprise when is the own daughter who appears. Well, not her properly but a perfect android copy. The clone is physically, and up to the last hair, indistinguishable from the original. Even the parents are unable to tell the difference. And, the most surprising thing, also his brain is in all the questions as the primitive. It has the same memories, its knowledge, and even its specific character. Therefore, we can think it’s the same person for all purposes. And it could be the truth in the short term, because of these differences. Its body is now forever and is not threatened by diseases of an organic body. Then, it can also change its parts, if desired. We can consider this as a real advantage, no doubt. But, the main changes are in brain. As an electronic brain it can connect to the all other computer on Earth, sharing the more extensive network for making the largest supercomputer ever done. As a result, the possibilities are endless. And here some questions which this documentary proposes. At the ends, when the AI is fully developed and even get the self-consciousness, which is its relationship with humans? The AI is really here to supporting us? Or to replace us? So, am I the only one whose hair bristling thinking about this?

Corrections · 2

0

Year million (2)

Three days later  the doorbell rings at home. You can imagine the surprise when it is his own daughter who appears. Well, not her properly but a perfect android copy. The clone is physically, and up to the last hair, indistinguishable from the original. Even the parents are unable to tell the difference. the doorbell rings:  el sujeto tiene estar primero, antes del verbo aqui para sonar fluidez
And, the most surprising thing,  her brain is also in all respects the same as the original. It has the same memories, its knowledge, and even  her specific / the same character/personality.
Therefore, we can think it’s the same person for all (practical) purposes. And it could be the truth in the short term, because of these differences????  , because there are essentially no outward differences between the two.  for all practical purposes - una expression, muy comun
Its body is now eternal and is not threatened by diseases of an organic body. In addition, its parts can also be changed, if desired. We can consider this (as) a real advantage, no doubt.     be changed- aqui yo usaria la voz passiva porque, presuntamente, el roboto no cambiara sus partes propios por su cuenta.
But, the main changes are in the brain. As an electronic brain it can connect to the all other computers on Earth, thus making (it) the largest supercomputer ever done.   making ..... done   es redundante, make=done aqui , entonces elimina done. O "creating the largest supercomputer ever made" Todavia redundante pero al menos, suena mejor. Un punto avanzado, ignoralo, si deseas.    As a result, the possibilities are endless.
And here some questions which this documentary proposes/raises. In the end, when the AI is fully developed and even obtains/acquires self-consciousness, what is its relationship with humans? Is  AI  really here to support us? Or to replace us?
So, am I the only one whose hair bristling thinking about this? En ingles, diriamos (hombres): Am I the only one losing hair over this? Tal vez otros tendran ideas aqui porque "hair bristling" no es una frase ingles que reconozco.

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today