Corrections · 1
Are the sentences correct?
Considering the general description of the claim shown by the evidence 5 of A 3, the dead Kim (passed away on October 3, 2014) made a relation with TRAN (born in 1953), a Thai woman who gave a birth to a son who is the plaintiff.Based on his claim supported by evidence 5 of A3, the dead Kim, who passed away on October 3, 204, had a relationship with a Thai woman, a certain Ms. Tran who was born in 1953, and she had bore him a son, who is now the plaintiff.
Human Pass, an official DNA inspection organization, A well-regarded DNA testing laboratory tested his DNA to check if the plaintiff is indeed the son of the dead Kim. The result showed that the percentage of both of them having a father- son relationship relation as a son and a father is more than 99.999%. This is conclusive evidence in favour of the plaintiff. recognizable.
(Therefore, it is clearly evident that the plaintiff is the son of the dead Kim.)> repeating.
Therefore, the plaintiff’s claim against the defendant has merit .in this case is reasonable. I will deliberate on refer to the claim and come to a decision, after which I will pass judgement (on the case). as shown in the text of judgment.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
