if there is any grammar mistakes Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and explorer. He claimed to have reached the North Pole,there's three argument provide strong support for the truth of his claim.However, the speaker has opposite view point about this. The first point is that the committee's investigation. Although in the article it claims, the committee declared Peary had indeed reached the North Pole.The speaker says the committee's report is biased because they are Peary's close friend and they support Peary's trip.Also, the investigation only 2 days, they didn't see his record carefully. Second point is that the lecturer refute the reading by mentioning speed issue.Thought the article states that's possible Peary reached the North Pole 37 days after setting out from Ellesmere Island off the coast of Greenland, she argues that the way Tom Avery's trip is too different to compete with Peary's trip.Tom Avery carry less than Peary because his food is drop by the plane. Moreover,weather condition is different.Tom Avery travel in favorable condition unlike Peary travel in unfavorable condition. Third point is that photographs.While the article indicates Peary's photographs correspond exactly to the Surf position as it should have been on that day,the speaker point out the sun shadow is hard to measure sun's position as well as the photograph is blur and unfocused also it's fade so it's not conference to be as evidence.