Video recording bests written records? Video recording is more advantageous to written records in some ways. Video record is more accurate and convincing when documenting temporal but seminal events, such as the winning touchdown in the Big Bowl or the tournament of Roses Parade. Video record is also more appropriate in documenting such a event that moving images are the central part of it. A well-written report of hurricane, tornado or volcanic eruption is likely to be out-shined by the powerful nature of a video record. A diary entry is unlikely to outstrip to moving motions by “replaying” wedding reception, dance recital, or a surprise party. Moreover, a real estate brochure cannot inform the lighting, spaciousness and general ambiance of a property nearly as effectively as a video. However, in other ways written records surpass video recording. Certain legal processes is best supported by the written documentation, such as a contractual agreement, and incorporation, or the establishment of a trust. Also, written records provide the richness and dimension of information more effectively than the videos. Finally, video records are unable to present the statistical or other quantitative results. In sum, video recording and written records are important to us. While what we view through a camera lens provides us with only one dimension of our lives, written documentation will present us with logic and well-established ideas and thoughts.