Clarifications Good morning Mrs. XXX, during the inspection we have used the documentation provided by the supplier because already printed and ready for the inspection (at sub-supplier facility it was not possible to do colour stamps or automatic scanner). As agreed with the customer before the inspection, a matching of the documents provided by him with the ones taken by the supplier to verify the approval status has been done: - for ITP the approval was revealed by the stamp and sign of YYY in first page, for the other ones the approval was revealed from the fact that the documents were directly received from the customer (notification attached RFID); -after the positive matching it was thought to use the documents already printed to accelerate the inspection, have some prints of superior quality and for uniformity, also highlighting however in the report that ITP is also formally approved and the other documents are informally approved; - actually we could have put both documents (ITP) in report attachment but this could have created some doubts about the fact that the technical drawings did not have the formal approval (stamp and sign) furthermore ITP has been inserted as a report attachment for reference even if according to the specifications it was not a document to be signed mandatorily . In any another similar case I will arrange to ask for detailled instructions during the inspection. If further clarifications are needed please let me know. Thanks and best regards,