Search from various English teachers...
South Korea flag김기수
if you are willing to underrstand my writing fully, I recommend you to read all my writings. When an abandoned child by parents happens to meet them in the street, will he be pleased with them? Absolutely not. Because of dismissing the premise, they could not be considered my side. As a married couple part away at any time, so could the relation of father and son. The cause of Albert Camus winning the Nobel Prize is that. That result in Lee Moon-yul’s literary works being considered a kind of trash. Camus spoke about the truth while Lee deceived his reader. Thus Camus got the prize but Lee was ridiculed. The reason why criminals commits the crime and does the deviation is nothing less than settling the wrong arrangement of the separation between my side and the others. Their logic is embodied in blindly thinking of family and community as his side and operated in acting that I have to protect my side as the order of the logic. But the premise and logic is nothing farther from the truth. It might not have been my side. Putting the coin named condition like premise in a game machine will make them my side.

Corrections · 4

2

Could I make a small comment?
Once you start using "their/they" DON'T switch to "his" and "I" when you still continue talking about "them". Stick to the plural form to the end or also use "one". Otherwise, before you know, your reader will get confused.


For example: "The reason why criminals commit the crime and do deviant things is nothing less than settling the wrong arrangement of the separation between my(their) side and the (that of the) others. Their logic is embodied in blindly thinking of family and community as his (on their) side and operated in acting that I (one/they) have to protect my(one's/their) side as the order of the logic."

 

If you still want to stick to "my and his", then I would advise to use quotation marks as if you replicate a real speech of someone, but don't forget to add something like "The logic of those people is as follows: "I have to protect my side...".

2

if you are willing to underrstand my writing fully, I recommend you to read all my writings.

When a child abandoned by parents happens to meet them in the street, will he be pleased with them? Absolutely not. Because of dismissing the premise, they could not be considered on my side. As a married couple parts from each other at any time, so could the relation of father and son be cut.

The cause of Albert Camus winning the Nobel Prize is like that. That resulted in Lee Moon-yul’s literary works being considered a kind of trash. Camus spoke about the truth while Lee deceived his reader. Thus, Camus got the prize, but Lee was ridiculed.

The reason why criminals commit the crime and do deviant things is nothing less than settling the wrong arrangement of the separation between my side and the others. Their logic is embodied in blindly thinking of family and community as on his side and operated under that assumption that I have to protect my side as the order of the logic. But the premise and logic cannot be farther from the truth. It might not have been my side. Putting the coin named condition like premise in a game machine will make them my side.

 

[Very good.  Something to think about.]

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today