Search from various English teachers...
Russia flagViktoriya
philosofy why uderstand:I louse shaking, or the right to have? ( who say this ? please, please,pleasee, dont use a google)))

Corrections · 18

0

Hello Viktoriya

I don't speak Russian, so this is just to help with your English.

 

Philosophy

Do you  understand ? :I louse shaking, or the right to have ?
( Who said this ? please, please, please, dont use  google)))

 

Notes:

The past tense of "to say" is "said" , you should have used this when talking

about something in the past.

 

The word google is now becoming both a noun and a verb, so you can leave out the "a".

 

Written English and spoken English are different things in many ways.

Written English has a lot of conventions and rules. One reason for punctuation is to

highlight the important parts of text as if it was being spoken. That way you can understand what the writer is trying to tell you.

 

In this case, you have a number of spelling mistakes but most of what you are trying to convey can be understood.

 

However your main question "I louse shaking, or the right to have ?", I don't understand. You have two sentences both ending with a question mark following each other.

These are

Do you  understand ? :I louse shaking, or the right to have ?

Sentence 1 - Do you understand ? ( that is clear)

Sentence 2 - I louse shaking, or the right to have ? ( that is not clear)


Reasons for lack of clarity for sentence 2 

- what do you mean by "louse"

- the format of the sentence is not the format of a question.


Can you give us more information ?


 

0

Philosophy

What are your thoughts on the statement: "Am I a trembling louse (contemptable man) or do I have the right..."

(Who says this? Please, please, please don't use google)))

 

 

 

*Thanks for the challenge =) Without context though, it will be hard for people to give their opinion on the statement.

 

If I were going to ask this, I would say: Am I just a simple man, or is there something more in me? Something that gives me an additional right to power, a right to kill.

 

0
yes! Michael thank you very mutch!
0
Dostoyevsky? Raskolnikov?
0
phrase is the correct spelling. You could write - I added more of the phrase so that it can be seen in context. You could also write - I added more of the quote so that it can be seen in context. Looking at you larger quote, this looks like a modern writer rather than something from the classical Russian literature. Is this a Western writer ?

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today