Please help me modify this

This table showed the proportion of different catergories of families who  lived in poverty in Australia in 1999.
It indicated that the proportion of people from single parent families who were living in poverty was high , being 21% ,while the lowest proportion was 14%,  which was that of people who were middle aged couples. The highest figures occured in the types of couples with children, about 11,1960 people were living in poverty.The lowest figure was 1920, related to  middle aged couples.

From the Households table, people  who were living in poverty were 11%, that was 202,070 people.
From the table we can see clearly that single people who lived in poverty were 6%, while  middle aged couples were only 4%. It was the same trend with people who were single with no children and the couples with no children, each scoring 19% and 7% of  their own categories.

Also, the proportion of sole parents living in poverty was more than of couples with children. Taking all of the above into consideration, we can draw the conclusion that single people  in 1999, were inclined to be poorer than couples.

This table was in 1999, so you must use the past tense.

please help me modify this

This table shows the proportion of different catrgories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
It indicateds that the largest group proportion of people living in poverty - 21%, were forom soe single prarent familyies living in poverty is high which is 21% while the smallest group lowest proportion i was that of elderly people from aged couples - 4%.  The highest poverty rate among couplesfigure occurreds in the type of couple those with children, at about 111,960. people were living in poverty. The lowest figure rate among those with children iwas still elderly the type of aged couples at 1,920.  From the angle standpoint of all households, people living in poverty accounted for 11% which is 202,070. people.
fFrom the table we can clearly see clearly that single, elderly individules aged person who lived in poverty accounted for takes 6% of its type while aged elderly couples accounted for only takes 4%. It's tThe same tendency occurred with among people who is were single with no children and the couples with no children, each takes accounted for 19% and 7% respectively. of its own type. Also, the proportion of sole single parents living in poverty is was greater more than which that of couples with children. From all Taking all of the above takes into consideration, we can draw the conclusion that single person is individules are more inclined to be poorer than couples.

This table shows the proportion of different catrgories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 
It indicates that the largest group of people living in poverty - 21%, were from single prarent families while the smallest group was that of elderly couples - 4%.  The highest poverty rate among couples occurred in those with children at about 111,960.  The lowest rate among those with children was still elderly couples at 1,920.  From the standpoint of all households, people living in poverty accounted for 11% which is 202,070. 
From the table we can clearly see that single, elderly individules who lived in poverty accounted for 6% while  elderly couples accounted for only 4%.  The same tendency occurred among people who were single with no children and couples with no children, each accounted for 19% and 7% respectively.  Also, the proportion of single parents living in poverty was greater than that of couples with children.  Taking all of the above into consideration, we can draw the conclusion that single individules are more inclined to be poor than couples.

PLEASE DO NOT BE DISCOURAGED!  THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT PASSAGE.  ALSO, MY CORRECTIONS ARE IN AMERICAN ENGLISH WHICH IS NOT THE SAME AS AUSTRALIAN ENGLISH.