Yound or elderly , which is more compentent for leaders. My writing: It is common that most leaders are the elderly. However, while young people have some unique characters, so I approve they can also be a leader in teams. Compared with the elderly, young people exactly have some deficiency to be a leader. Their work time is shorter and experience less frustrations and crisis than old people. So, their experience is not as abundant as old people. This point is important for those subordinates. They are more willing to trust a person who had handled similar events many times rather than a novice. Therefore, it might be more difficult for young people to lead an organization to operate stably. However, young people possess some advantages that old people do not have or have lost. They are more adventurous and innovative in making decision for teams. As a result, they can perceive the potential neglected by seniors and dare to make the attempts that seniors will not access easily. Sometimes, these audacious thoughts generate incredible success and leave a deep impression to those old people. Furthermore, young people are more energetic and passionate. These features can influence the work pace of whole team. When their subordinates notice their leader work actively, they will submerge into work subliminally. Consequently, young people are more appropriate for the team which need more vitality or drastic reforms. In conclusion, I think young people can be a leader as old people. But they are adaptable for different organizations. Old leaders are adept at avoiding risk and operate team stably, while young leaders can bring vigor and unpredictable change to a team.