Should we discriminate genius from ordinary children？ My writing： The emergence of genius always draws the particular attention, and human tend to allocate better resource to them, hoping they can grow better. But I think the resources or surroundings regarded as the best by us may be not definitely appropriate for them. Collective study allows students to learn something that they cannot acquire when they study alone. Even for the talents, they can learn some social skills during the period of getting along with peers. While, conventional concept usually describe that the genius is solitary person. I suppose these words should be applied in their learning rather their whole life. Besides ordinary students can learn some unique learning skills from genius, which conduce them to making bigger academic progress. Therefore, the mixture of genius and ordinary people will benefit bilaterally. However, some opponents insist that it is a waste of their talent if we put them into a common environment. Admittedly, the learning capacity of genius is superior to peers, and they may feel miserable or helpless when they live in a place where their peers and teachers are not able to understand their advanced thought. Therefore, if they grow in a barren soil, their talent will miss the golden period of development. It is really regretful loss for them and human beings. From my perspective, the learning mode should respect the will of genius and be applicable for their situation. We actually provide better academic context for them, meanwhile, we should not deprive them of the opportunities of communicating and making friend with peers. Because genius can learn some extracurricular things from ordinary students. In a word, we should offer especially academic treatment, at the same time, we should give them entire life which include the things out of study.