Search from various English teachers...
Russia flagAlexandr Stal
Essay: Ridiculous extravagance or elaborate investment? (Please, check errors) Moscow officials are criticized by civilians for expensive costs for city beautification and holiday carnivals. Last years item of expenditure in Moscow budget on beautification is comparable to federal expenses for army and navy. For example, this New Year and Christmas holidays Moscow was decorated by illumination, numerous ice and plastic figures, natural or synthetic Christmas trees. Manmade snow was thrown on central streets. Total cost of “Christmas beautification” is about 2 billions Russian rubles (approximate 30 million dollars). Some people say it is not good to throw money on carnivals in capital while lot of people in province have no enough money for food. Opposition offer spend money for more necessary things, such as medical services - building hospitals, increasing payment for medical workers, procurementing medical devices and medicaments in clinic. Officials say beautification is not extravagance but investment. Illumination, carnivals and ice figures attract tourist. So far tourist stream in Moscow was increased about four times - form 5 millions per year in 2013 to 20 millions in 2019. Tourism brings money for city budget. Opposition answer they are not against tourists or holidays but against groundless and expensive customs. They blame officials for suspicious customs in organization which looks related with officials.

Corrections · 5

1
Essay: Ridiculous extravagance or elaborate investment? (Please, check errors)

Moscow officials are criticized by civilians for expensive costs for spending a lot on city beautification and holiday carnivals.
Moscow's budget item of expenditure in on beautification last year was comparable to the federal expenditure for the Army and Navy. For example, this New Year and Christmas holidays, Moscow was decorated by with illumination, numerous ice and plastic figures, and natural or synthetic Christmas trees. Manmade snow was thrown on central streets. The total cost of “Christmas beautification” is about 2 billions Russian rubles (approximately 30 million dollars).
Some people say it is not good to throw money on carnivals in the capital while lots of people in the provinces haven't enough money for food.
The Opposition offers to spend money for on more necessary things, such as medical services - building hospitals, increasing payment for medical workers, procurementing medical devices and medication in clinics.
Officials say beautification is not an extravagance but an investment. Illumination, carnivals and ice figures attract tourists. So far, the tourist stream in Moscow has increased about four times - from 5 millions per year in 2013 to 20 millions in 2019. Tourism brings money for the city budget.
The Opposition answers that they are not against tourists or holidays, but against groundless and expensive customs. They blame officials for suspicious customs in organization which looks like it is related with officials.

Ok, not too bad. Be careful with the articles, "the" for specific things; "a" or "an" for nonspecific things and no article when you are talking about something in general, for example, apples are red.
Notice that million doesn't have "s" on the end. We would only use the plural if we wanted to say more than one, but not exactly how many: 20 million; many millions.
Keep practicing. Simón.
1
Александр-- understandable, but grammatical corrections suggested below.
If you could respond (in Russian) with what was meant by the last sentence, I could try to give a better corrections.

Best,
Валерий

Essay: Ridiculous extravagance or elaborate investment? (Please, check errors)

Moscow officials are criticized by civilians for expensive excessive costs for city beautification and holiday carnivals.
Last years item of expenditure in THE Moscow budget on beautification is comparable to federal expenses for THE army and navy. For example, this (YEAR, FOR THE) New Year and Christmas holidays Moscow was decorated by illumination, numerous ice and plastic figures, AND natural or synthetic Christmas trees. Manmade snow was thrown PLACED on central streets. Total cost of “Christmas beautification” is about 2 billions Russian rubles (approximateLY 30 million dollars).
Some people say it is not good to throw moneyAWAY, OR SPEND MONEY on carnivals in THE capital while ALOT lot of people in THE PROVINCES province have no DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH .. enough money for food.

Opposition offer THE OPPOSITION spend money for more necessary things, such as medical services - building hospitals, increasing payment for medical workers, procurementing medical devices and medicaments in clinic.

Officials say beautification is not AN extravagance but AN investment. Illumination, carnivals and ice figures attract touristS. So far tourist stream TOURISM, OR THE NUMBER OF TOUROSTS in Moscow was increased about four times - form 5 millions per year in 2013 to 20 millions in 2019. Tourism brings money for THE city budget.
Opposition offer THE OPPOSITION answerS THAT they are not against tourists or holidays but against groundless and expensive customs. They blame officials for suspicious customs in organization which looks related with officials. They criticize officials for expenditures which appear to benefit the officials themselves.

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today