Could you correct my writing? In this article, personal information such as the name of the student arrested in Hong Kong and the name of the university was written. I basically take the opposite of putting personal information in articles. Since the student went to the place where the protest demonstration was held, he was arrested by Hong Kong police, after all he had no part in it. Japan government already released his information, but by reporting and writing article, More and more people will know him and they look it up, some people may spread false information. He is now a third-year student at university, and in general, he is about to start job hunting. Even if he doesn't commit a crime, it is likely that this accident will have a bad effect on finding a job. For example, if you run a search his name, he will see "arrest" with his name on search suggestion. In addition, recently more and more companies run a background check for employment, so if recruitment staff notice them, it will be a disadvantage when looking for work. I agree with reporting personal information depending on the nature of the incident and situation, because it has the effect of preventing recurrence. However, for this news I think that reporting personal information should be refrained for the reasons mentioned above.